Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleshner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Laudenslager, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleshner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Laudenslager, M. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, Vol. 3, No. 2, 114-130 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1534582304269027
© 2004 SAGE Publications

Psychoneuroimmunology: Then and Now

Monika Fleshner

University of Colorado-Boulder

Mark L. Laudenslager

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

Psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) emerged in the neurosciences in the late 1970s to early 1980s and has extended to influence the fields of psychology, psychiatry, endocrinology, physiology, and the biomedical research community. This review documents the journey of PNI from the early 1980s to the present. Today, we recognize that the highly complex immune system interacts with an equally complex nervous system in a bidirectional manner. Evolutionarily old signals continue to play a role in these communications, as do mechanisms for protection of the host. The disparity between physical and psychological stressors is only an illusion. Host defense mechanisms respond in adaptive and meaningful ways to both. The present review will describe a new way of thinking about evolutionarily old molecules, heat shock proteins, adding to a body of evidence suggesting that activation of the acute stress response is a double-edged sword that can both benefit and derail optimal immunity.

Key Words: psychoneuroimmunology • stress • immunity • neuroendocrine regulation • sickness behavior • heat shock proteins • danger signal model


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
P. A. NEPOMNASCHY, E. SHEINER, G. MASTORAKOS, and P. C. ARCK
Stress, Immune Function, and Women's Reproduction
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2007; 1113(1): 350 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Johnson, J. Campisi, C. M. Sharkey, S. L. Kennedy, M. Nickerson, and M. Fleshner
Adrenergic receptors mediate stress-induced elevations in extracellular Hsp72
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2005; 99(5): 1789 - 1795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]